Poachers in Africa are encroaching on wildlife land and killing rhinos in travel hot spots now devoid of visitors due to the coronavirus pandemic.
Eating beef is more harmful to the environment than driving a car
North American study reveals that the environmental impact of beef is superior to that of other farm animals.
The simplest way to cut CO2 emissions, which put in trouble our Planet? That’s easy, eating less red meat. According to a new study published in the journal Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences the environmental impact of beef cattle has a greater footprint than other meat, including chicken and pork.
It is a well-known fact that meat has a heavy impact on the environment, but this study shows clearly the scope of damage, in particular for beef. The production of red meat needs 28 times more land, 11 times more water than that of pork and chicken and generates five times more polluting emissions. If compared to vegetables like potatoes, wheat and rice, the impact of beef is exponentially greater and the land required to breed beef is 160 times bigger than that necessary to cultivate these crops.
Agriculture plays an important role in global warming and causes 15 percent of all emissions, half of which are generated by cattle breeding. The enormous quantity of wheat and water required to raise cattle is a source of concern to experts, who envisage a significant growth of world population by 2050. Until now, urgings to reduce meat consumption to help the environment have been accepted with scepticism.
«Cutting subsidies for meat production would be the least controversial way to reduce its consumption», claimed professor Gidon Eshel, researcher at Bard College who led the study on red meat’s environmental impact. «Governments should consider these messages carefully if they want to improve overall production efficiency and reduce the environmental impacts – stated Mark Sutton, professor at the UK’s Centre for Ecology and Hydrology – but the message for the consumer is even stronger. Avoiding excessive meat consumption, especially beef, is good for the environment».
Actor and environmental activist Leonardo DiCaprio has contributed two million dollars to a fund to protect Virunga National Park in Congo from threats such as terrorism, the coronavirus and poaching.
Bangladesh suffered widespread damage as a result of Cyclone Amphan. Yet the Sundarbans mangrove forest acted as a natural barrier protecting the country from further destruction, as it has done countless times before.
For the first time in seventeen years, Iceland’s two main whaling companies won’t resume whale hunting. The announcement concerns this year’s season but could carry into the future.
The relationship between the coronavirus and wildlife is complex: while the pandemic may lead to a reduction in the illegal trade in wild animals, it may also encourage it in other respects.
The largest coral reef in the world is severely threatened by climate change, but researchers are developing strategies that could contribute to saving the Great Barrier Reef.
NGO Free the Bears has opened a mountain sanctuary for moon bears in Laos. With the government’s help, it aims to close all bile farms by 2022.
The Covid-19 pandemic is a planetary wake-up call from the Earth to humanity. On Earth Day, over 500 organisations launched a global call for urgent action with the health and wellbeing of all peoples and the planet at its core.
Pollution in India has fallen drastically without the fumes of cars and factories. It’s been thirty years since the Himalayas were last visible from such a distance.