Ultra-processed foods are addictive and harmful like cigarettes, study finds

Ultra-processed foods share more characteristics with cigarettes than with fruits and vegetables: according to researchers, regulating them like tobacco could reduce the risks to public health.

Ultra-processed foods should be regulated more like cigarettes than like food: this is the conclusion of a study carried out by researchers at the University of Michigan, Duke University and Harvard University, published in early February in the public health journal Milbank Quarterly.

cibi ultra-processati
According to the authors, ultra-processed foods have more in common with cigarettes than with food © Getty Images

The study is a review that synthesised findings from addiction science, nutrition research and public health history in order to identify the structural and sensory characteristics that increase the “reinforcing potential” — that is, the ability of a stimulus to make a behaviour more likely to be repeated in the future — in both cigarettes and ultra-processed foods.

“Many ultra-processed foods share more characteristics with cigarettes than with minimally processed fruits or vegetables, and therefore justify regulation proportionate to the significant public health risks they represent,” the researchers concluded.

From product design to marketing strategies: ultra-processed foods, like cigarettes

Ultra-processed foods are products that undergo extensive industrial transformation. They contain a range of additives such as colourings and preservatives, high amounts of sugar, salt and fat, and are often calorie-dense but low in nutrients. Examples include packaged snacks, sugary drinks and ready-made meals, but also sliced packaged bread and sugar-coated breakfast cereals.

cibi ultra-processati
Marketing of ultra-processed foods often relies on healthwashing strategies © Getty Images

The study explains that cigarettes and ultra-processed foods are not simply natural products, but highly engineered delivery systems, specifically designed to create dependence and encourage consumption. The tobacco and ultra-processed food industries have used similar strategies to increase product appeal, evade regulation and shape public perception. These include dose optimisation, the addition of additives, rapid gratification and reward for the body, and “healthwashing”: slogans such as “low fat” or “sugar-free” were compared to cigarette filter advertising in the 1950s — a strategy that did not, in reality, provide significant health benefits. 

As the researchers point out, these design features hijack human biology, undermine individual agency and contribute heavily to the costs of disease and healthcare. Ultra-processed foods are in fact associated with many of the same health risks as smoking, including heart disease, cancer and premature death.

Regulating ultra-processed foods like cigarettes for the benefit of public health

The authors therefore suggest that ultra-processed foods should be evaluated not only through a nutritional lens, but also using the same criteria applied to tobacco regulation.

cibi ultra-processati
The researchers propose interventions that shift responsibility from individual consumers to the food industry © Getty Images

Marketing restrictions, improved labelling, or structural measures such as taxes or limits on availability in schools and hospitals could help address the public health threat posed by ultra-processed foods, shifting the focus from individual responsibility to the accountability of the food industry.

 

Siamo anche su WhatsApp. Segui il canale ufficiale LifeGate per restare aggiornata, aggiornato sulle ultime notizie e sulle nostre attività.

Licenza Creative Commons
Quest'opera è distribuita con Licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 4.0 Internazionale.

L'autenticità di questa notizia è certificata in blockchain. Scopri di più
Related articles