A report by Ember explains that in 2025 electricity generation from renewables (solar, wind and hydropower) surpassed that from fossil fuel sources.
Uno studio ha provato a calcolare il valore economico di animali, piante e servizi ecosistemici, con risultati sorprendenti.
Plankton, a group of different species of protozoa, algae, bacteria, and eukaryotic organisms, is worth 222 billion dollars, i.e. more than the annual turnover of Apple, Microsoft, or Nestlé.
Assuming that price tags are good for objects but not for animals, plants, and mountains, nature cannot be just valued considering mere economic values. However, in a world that often focuses on money, it can be a useful tool to help remind us that nature does have a value, and what might be lost if aspects of it disappear.
For this reason, BBC Earth, network aimed to scientific divulgation, has realised the Earth Index, putting nature’s value in the stock exchange, published in the financial sections of the Wall Street Journal (US); Times (London); Singapore Business Times (Singapore) and the Economic Times (India) putting nature on the stock exchange for the first time.
The index has been calculated in collaboration with the British environmental specialist Tony Juniper, commissioning a scoping study from the United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC).
“We scoured the available research and data to find comparable figures to company stock listings and settled on the financial value delivered each year,” said Juniper. “What this unequivocally shows is the major contribution that nature makes to our health, wealth and security.”
Freshwater alone, for instance, is worth the entire global economy. Therefore, according to the Earth Index, the total aggregate value of the water-related services provided by Nature is presented as at equivalent to global GDP, i.e. about $73.48 trillion.
The value of trees is more than $16 trillion. Forests play an essential role to some 1.6 billion people, which subsistence depends on them. Moreover, trees are our major allies in reducing CO2.
Bees’ and other pollinators’ work, essential to agriculture and other functions, is worth 106 billion dollars, whilst a single colony has an annual value of 141 dollars. What about beavers? One individual of this funny rodent, which we might think it could not influence our lives, annually produces services worth 120,000 dollars, for its contribution to reduce the risks of flooding and improve water conservation.
The study aims to highlight practical and economic advantages deriving from natural resources, in a way that we can better understand the real impact climate change has on the long run on the natural capital.
If the environment was a listed company, brokers (us) would have the right to complain about the senseless natural resource management.
Siamo anche su WhatsApp. Segui il canale ufficiale LifeGate per restare aggiornata, aggiornato sulle ultime notizie e sulle nostre attività.
![]()
Quest'opera è distribuita con Licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 4.0 Internazionale.
A report by Ember explains that in 2025 electricity generation from renewables (solar, wind and hydropower) surpassed that from fossil fuel sources.
The Tyler Prize, considered the “Nobel Prize for the Environment,” has been awarded to Toby Kiers, an American biologist working in Amsterdam.
Belgium is one of the countries most exposed to climate change. Dune–dikes are a solution to curb sea-level rise.
Between October 2024 and September 2025, the average temperature in the Arctic was 1.6 degrees Celsius higher than during the 1991–2020 period.
Undeclared conflicts of interest, paid authors, lack of transparency: one of the most cited studies on glyphosate, published in 2000, has been retracted.
The Copernicus service has released data for the first eleven months of 2025: global warming is set to come close to last year’s record.
The European Council and Parliament have reached an agreement on the European Commission’s proposal to deregulate new GMOs. But farming, organic agriculture, and environmental organizations are calling for it to be stopped.
The world’s second-largest producer has taken a historic decision. However, farms will have until 2034 to shut down.
A Greenpeace report denounces Russia’s political and economic model: a nexus of extractivism, authoritarianism and war that is destroying the environment, with serious repercussions for the global ecosystem.



