According to analysts, the emergence of a “super” El Niño could trigger a global food price shock, adding to inflationary pressures already fuelled by the conflict with Iran.
Scotland wants to protect its environment: it says no to GMOs
The country part of the United Kingdom has decided to ban the cultivation of genetically modified crops in order to protect its environmental heritage.
There’s a war going on in the world of agriculture, between organic or traditional crops and genetically modified crops. It’s a conflict taking place quietly, far from spotlights. Yet, it involves us all, since our nutrition is concerned.
Scotland has decided where to side, by completely banning the cultivation of GM products, as announced by Richard Lochhead, Cabinet Secretary for Rural Affairs, Food and Environment for the autonomous Scottish government.
“Scotland is known around the world for our beautiful natural environment, and banning growing genetically modified crops will protect and further enhance our clean, green status,” said Lochhead.
However, the choice doesn’t only have environmental reasons, but also economic. In fact, the axiom saying that GM cultivations are more productive than the organic ones is no longer valid.
“There is no evidence of significant demand for GM products by Scottish consumers and I am concerned that allowing GM crops to be grown in Scotland would damage our clean and green brand, thereby gambling with the future of our 14 billion-pound food and drink sector.”
Scotland will thus ask to be excluded by any kind of decision of the EU to allow GM crops. Scotland’s stance has been favourably welcomed by the Scottish Crofting Federation, which represents the country’s small farmers, and by other civil society organisations, which wrote an open letter of support to the Scottish government.
“We underline the precautionary principle that the Scottish Government upholds – that the potential risks from GMOs to public health and our environment outweigh any potential benefits of the technology. As stakeholders in Scotland’s food system, we recognise the importance of protecting and enhancing Scotland’s reputation for good, clean food.”
With this choice, Scotland distances itself from the British government, since it is more open towards GMOs, and will be maybe labelled as anti-progressive. The preventive answer is contained in the letter of support by farmers.
“We are not against science, our opposition arises because with good reason we do not trust the claims made by corporations with a vested interest in controlling our food system.”
Siamo anche su WhatsApp. Segui il canale ufficiale LifeGate per restare aggiornata, aggiornato sulle ultime notizie e sulle nostre attività.
Quest'opera è distribuita con Licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 4.0 Internazionale.
Residents of Kanseche, Malawi, accuse ABF of contributing to the devastating 2022 floods through its subsidiary, Illovo Sugar.
Ecuador’s shrimp exports continue to grow, but the country’s mangrove ecosystems are paying the highest price.
A women’s collective in Nigeria is taking on illegal activities carried out by men within a protected area. Their grassroots conservation model is proving so effective that it is now being adopted by neighbouring villages.
What if the International Criminal Court could prosecute ecocide? The debate remains open, and a new proposal is adding momentum to the discussion.
France, Spain, Portugal and Greece are fighting wildfires, some of which are still out of control.
Two powerful earthquakes have left at least 1,450 people dead and 50,000 missing in Venezuela. The country’s ongoing economic and social crisis is also hampering rescue operations.
An extreme heatwave is affecting many European countries: it is a consequence of the climate crisis. And it is only expected to get worse.
Much of Western Europe is already dealing with temperatures that in many cities are approaching or exceeding 35°C.