The Goldman Environmental Prize, the “green Nobel Prize”, is awarded annually to extraordinary activists fighting for the well-being of the planet.
The truth about nuclear power: NGOs reveal CO2 “omissions”
Uno studio realizzato per conto di alcune associazioni francesi smentisce l’idea che le centrali nucleari non producano CO2.
“As of 2028 or 2030, we will start to install new generation nuclear reactors, Epr NM, in France. These reactors, as of 2050-2055, will replace all current nuclear power stations: we will have 30, 35, maybe 40 reactors available”. And, by doing this, it will be possible to save the environment, as more energy will be produced whilst no CO2 will be emitted. This is what Jean-Bernard Lévy, CEO of the giant EDF, has affirmed on 23 October.
These statements, alongside raising a wave of criticism in France, have triggered the interventions of numerous NGOs, from the network Sortir du nucléaire a Réseau Action Climat, to France Nature Environnement and Greenpeace. The associations have published a study realised on their behalf by the independent research centre Wise-Paris, which conclusions are definitely clear: “The nuclear industry systematically overrates the role of the atom in the fight against greenhouse gas emissions. Firstly, it wrongly states it has – more or less – zero emissions. Secondly, in its calculations it always images that nuclear reactors will be built in place of thermal power station powered by fossil fuels”.
The report acknowledges that nuclear power (like solar and wind power) does not emit CO2 in the energy production process. However, it does it indirectly, if the entire cycle is taken into consideration. Particularly, the most hazardous emissions are caused by uranium extraction, fuel production, construction sites, as well as sites’ dismantlement. According to the study, considering all these factors, the benefits in terms of greenhouse gases significantly drop.
In particular, to date, nuclear power allows saving 1.5 billion tonnes of CO2 emissions worldwide. Such figure could seem particularly high, but it actually represents less than 4% of the total. France, where 80% of energy is derived from atoms, registered a decrease in emissions due to nuclear power of only 15%: pollution is still 4 times higher than levels compatible with environmental safeguard.
Therefore, according to the NGOs, the advantages are less substantial than declared by nuclear giants. If countries invest in the construction of new reactors, considering the limited contribution in terms of CO2, they should take the risks of accidents, military proliferation, and all problems linked to radioactive waste accumulation. Not to talk about the (high) costs needed to build next generation nuclear reactors.
Massive cyclones Tauktae and Yaas have claimed lives and livelihoods, as well as affecting the Covid-19 vaccination drive in India’s coastal states.
The deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon is returning to the abysmal levels of the early 2000s. And it’s not just Bolsonaro’s fault.
Plastic pollution is airborne too. Microplastics are being carried across continents by the wind, as a recent study reveals.
This year, Earth Day calls for us to restore damaged ecosystems, a challenge embraced by the UN through the Decade on Ecosystem Restoration.
In 2017 the world’s largest iceberg, known as A68, detached from the Larsen C ice shelf and began drifting along the ocean. Today, it has almost entirely melted away.
“The value of water is not its price”. We speak to Pedro Arrojo-Agudo, the new United Nations Special Rapporteur on the human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation.
A Kenyan company has developed a new technology, seed balls, to stop the devastation wrought by climate change and soil erosion on indigenous communities.
The immense rare earth and uranium mine on Mount Kuannersuit won’t go ahead. This is the promise that helped the Inuit community win Greenland’s elections.