Greta Thunberg asks leaders to do more for our climate in a podcast written during lockdown: the pandemic has taught us how to face a global emergency, she says.
What’s wrong with the E-waste trade in the USA
The US is the only developed nation still exporting high volumes of its toxic E-waste to developing countries. A money-saving practice with a high cost for the environment.
Driven by an endless thirst for new technology, Americans keep buying new gadgets, leaving behind older models. The result is the accumulation of huge amounts of toxic electronic waste. Some companies show ethics and responsibility by recycling within US borders despite high costs and low profitability. However, most manufacturers, more interested in their profits than the environment, decide to export such waste to developing countries as a money-saving measure.
Why the USA exports its E-waste
As the resale value of materials extracted by recycling has greatly declined in recent years, tech companies choose to ship their electronic waste to developing countries to avoid the higher cost of recycling at home. Responsible recycling companies are facing increasing costs to dispose of used tech devices safely and are losing business to companies that choose to ship electronic scraps overseas or just leave them in warehouses instead of processing them, as Hugo Neu Recycling and Sage Sustainable Electronics CEO’s Robert Houghton explains.
The dangers of improper disposal
The toxic lead, mercury and cadmium contained in many gadgets can poison the workers handling them, seep into the soil and groundwater, and contaminate the air when burned. Basel Action Network, named after the 1989 United Nations Basel Convention, was created in 1997 by Jim Puckett with the goal of restricting and ending the toxic trade of hazardous waste. Its most recent investigation involved tracking the final destination of old hazardous electronic equipment via GPS. As a result, the computer giant Dell Inc. and non-profit Goodwill were exposed for exporting E-waste to several Asian countries. Low prices on electronics make survival difficult for the recyclers. In Puckett’s words, “electronic waste on the whole isn’t worth anything”.
— KCTS 9 (@KCTS9) May 20, 2016
The controversial loophole allowing the US to export E-waste
While laws on electronic waste disposal and export exist in several US states, only the federal government has the power to restrict exports. Curiously, the US isn’t forbidden from shipping electronic waste abroad, because it’s the only developed nation that has signed, but not yet ratified, the Basel Convention on hazardous waste. American E-waste often ends up in China, India and Ghana, even though these nations are among the many countries not allowed to import such trash. Buyers purchase E-waste at arrival docks, risking toxic exposure in the hope of making some extra money through recycling. Sadly, only 25 per cent of the discarded electronics that are exported are repaired and reused.
According to the Environmental Protection Agency, the US generated 3.14 million tonnes of electronic waste in 2013, while the nation’s average household owns 28 consumer electronics. The United Nations reported that in 2014 only 16 per cent of the world’s E-waste was recycled. The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act promotes the safe management, export and disposal of hazardous waste; however, the EPA classifies most electronic waste as non-hazardous, with the exception of lead-lined glass cathode ray tubes, used in older models of televisions and computer monitors.
Apple’s best practice
As stated by Jim Puckett, Apple is one of the more responsible recyclers in the tech industry. The company’s annual Environmental Responsibility Report shows that in 2015 the company recycled discarded products equal to 71 per cent of the total weight of the merchandise it sold during the past seven years, while also diverting more than 40 million kilogrammes of E-waste from landfills. Apple works with over 160 recyclers around the world, all respecting rigorous standards of environmental compliance, health and safety, and social responsibility.
Making responsible choices as consumers
Most consumer technology companies are constantly releasing new devices, instead of making smartphones and other gadgets more durable, less toxic and easier to repair. Because of the relatively low-cost of electronics, buyers want new rather than refurbished products, therefore worsening the E-waste problem. Consumers can choose to buy only products that are made sustainably. They can also dispose of old gadgets by bringing them to recycling facilities certified under the e-Stewards program, fully compliant with the Basel Convention.
Black Lives Matter spokesperson Trahern Crews tells us about Minneapolis, the US city that has become a symbol of racism, police brutality and inequality.
Milan has announced one of Europe’s most ambitious mobility schemes, known as Strade Aperte (open roads). Its goal is to reduce cars in phase 2 of the lockdown by increasing bike lanes and pedestrian areas.
Earth Day is celebrated all over world on 22 April to raise awareness about the central issue uniting all of humanity: protecting our common home. This year marks the 50th anniversary.
A spotlight on Licypriya Kangujam, the eight-year-old Indian climate change activist raising her voice against climate change inaction and whose tireless campaigning has even led two Indian states to adopt climate change as a school subject.
Time magazine’s 100 Women of the Year project sheds light on influential women’s stories, from Amelia Earhart to Greta Thunberg. A selection of some of the greats for International Women’s Day.
After a legal battle that lasted two years, Indonesia’s Supreme Court has revoked the permit to mine for coal in the forests of South Kalimantan in Borneo.
What did Greta Thunberg tell participants at the 2020 World Economic Forum in Davos? Once again, the Swedish activist underlined the total lack of concrete solutions to the climate crisis presented by leaders so far.
A look at the 10 most important news stories of 2019 from the point of view of sustainability: to prepare for 2020, the first year of the “climate decade”.